Author: Stacie Perreault, MA, LMHC, CCCTIC, DAAETS
Ask Astra – Blog
May 29th, 2024
“Men need to sit with men that have a healed perspective of women. Ladies, need to surround themselves with women that have a healed perspective of men. The conversations are different. The energy is different. The love, appreciation, and respect is different.” Unknown
I saw this randomly on Facebook and thought it was provocative. My initial reaction was, “huh, well yes, I suppose I agree, the conversations would be different.” Beyond that initial thought, however, followed others; such as, 1. who the hell are you, random anonymous meme to dictate whom one should associate with?, (faux outrage is what social media is for, no?), 2. how does one define “healed”? 3. whom gets to define it?, 4. how does one locate these other honored “healed” ones?, but mostly my thought was… WHY?
The poster went on a tirade of the stereotypical male victimization narrative while simultaneously attacking women for claiming “perpetual victimhood”. And shouldn’t the women who are “above it all” who actually “like” men, hold themselves apart, and let the other, “man-haters” devolve into their common trauma-bonded toxic social circles?, (that last part was me paraphrasing, of course).
While I do believe that the goal should be “healing,” for all genders, non-binary included. I do not see how creating cliques of social communities achieves this man’s alleged goal.
Which… I’m not really sure what his goal was, to be honest, other than to complain that he’s a man and women don’t like him because of it… I suppose? (My guess is, that if he isn’t liked, it has more to do with his personality and / or behavior than his gender -but that’s just conjecture).
Anyway, my point is – healing isn’t a spontaneous moment of Gestalt. There is no, “aha! It wasn’t my fault, they were the asshole all long!” moment. It takes time, and COMMUNITY. Community with people who can relate to ones’ experience, yes, but also to those who have gone beyond it, AND those who have never gone through such things. How can one strive to create a healthy, safe, loving relationship if one has never seen one modeled for them before?
People I work with have a hard time believing that those relationships actually exist in the first place, let alone the possibility that they, themselves could actually experience one firsthand. Seeing someone happy, truly happy, safe and supported by another IS HEALING. OR, in contrast, seeing someone without a partner, however, whole within themselves. Finding the love, safety and support within is incredibly powerful and healing for someone who is striving to recover from abuse / victimization.
People who are hurting being tended to by others whose wounds may be scars now, but are faint, yet healed – though never completely, is essential to preventing generational trauma.
My other thought was, just because someone is not “healed” from their trauma, that does not mean that they cannot / do not appreciate and respect members of another gender. That does not mean that everyone’s trauma manifests itself to generalize all males, (for example,) as a threat. Sometimes it does, though most often it’s situational, or focused on stimuli avoidance, rather than focused on avoiding 50% of the worlds’ population. By this explanation, that would mean every traumatized person would never leave their bedroom for fear of encountering someone of another gender – this point is absurd.
#NotAllMen is tiresome. WE KNOW! Damn it, but ya’ll don’t go around wearing warning labels so we must exercise caution.
Not all racoons carry rabies, that doesn’t mean I’m going to go and pet the next furry little friend I cross paths with and take it home and feed it and let it sleep in my bed at night. Why? Because it MIGHT be one that has rabies, or more likely some other germ infested disease… or most likely, it’ll eat all my food, trash my house, and then move on, to do the same exact thing to my neighbor.
I wonder if Mr. LifeAdvice, would consider me healed?…
June 5th, 2024
No. The headlines are wrong.
Casandra Elizabeth Ventura was Brutally Attacked & Abused by Her, (at the time) Boyfriend, Sean “Ditty” Combs. – > There! I fixed it.
“Cassie”, as she is known, is an American singer, dancer, actress, and model. Her birthday is in August and she is a young woman in her 30’s. Her accomplishments include a song that ranked #3 of Billboard Hot 100 in 2006 and her self entitled debut album ranked #4 on Billboard 200 that same year! Cassie’s music career includes collaborations with many successful artists of her genre.
Additionally, Cassie has also modeled for brands such as Calvin Klein, GQ, Seventeen, & BUST & she was the face of ASOS 2013 Spring collection.
However, she is not only known for her beauty and her voice, she is also an accomplished actress as well! In films such as Step Up 2: The Streets & The Perfect Match.
How do I know all this? A simple google search. However, when you search for her name, inevitably the screen fills with images and articles riddled with “Ditty” all over it. Yes, he was a part of her career, so were many others. Yes, he was her long term boyfriend, however, she likely dated other people also. Are their names all over her google search? No.
I believe this to be the case for 2 reasons. 1. Because people consider “Ditty” to be the bigger “star” of the two. and 2. Because inevitably when a crime occurs, the media focuses almost exclusively on the perpetrator.
I want to make something very, very clear. Cassie’s success is due to HER OWN abilities and talents. Cassie’s value existed long before “Ditty,” and will long after. Forever binding her to him via headlines because he has victimized her, diminishes her as an artist and devalues her as a person.
SHE is worthy of headlines focusing on HER OWN accomplishments and a spotlight shown on HER. HE is worthy of silver bracelets and a 4×4 jailcell with a badly tempered roommate.
Oh, and that “apology” video, do not get me started! He never names her, does not direct an apology to HER. Apologizes for his behavior on this one video specifically, (after denying this incident ever happened REPEATEDLY – and trying to pay off the hotel to prevent the footage from going public,) which implies he is not sorry for any other instances of his behaviors for which he has NOT been publicly held accountable for. Even his word choice distances himself from taking direct ownership of his actions. He’s NOT sorry. He’s sorry he has been publicly outed for the behavior exhibited on the video because it is monstrous. His behavior in the aftermath equally so.
His “apology video” is disgusting and offensive that he believed for one moment that his statement was good enough to manipulate the entire country into believing that what he was exhibiting was true remorse. He needs to stick to music, because he is a TERRIBLE actor.
Will he one day be a reformed alter-boy? Yes, he will attend anger-management, find God, attend therapy, and some form of AA or NA. Perhaps visit a rehab retreat for a time, wait out the media storm, and then re-release a new project, “reformed” from his wicked ways, and, guess what, people will still buy it, because in this country we are complicit.
We were complicit when we didn’t believe Cassie when she told her truth the first time, we were complicit when we accused her of being a “gold digger,” we were complicit even when we watched her devastating trauma played out before our eyes – because that’s what it took for us to believe that a man who makes a lot of money – is capable of being an abuser. We were complicit when we selfishly refused to question our perception of a carefully marketed persona because we did not want to lose our music, give up our brand names or whatever it is we are clinging to.
Because whatever it is that the celebrity is providing to us – it means more than a woman’s victimhood. What does a woman’s tears have to do with us? Why is her fear our problem? “Ditty’s” star burned brighter only because believing in his innocence did more for us than believing in his guilt.
But when Truth was so forcibly put in front of us, to where we could no longer deny it, we will scorn and condemn him now… until such time as Group Think takes hold and the country moves on to another outrage, and “forgiveness” and “moving on from the past,” is what becomes prioritized.
And none of this will have anything to do with Cassie. What is best for her. What she desires. What she needs. One day in the future a reporter will ask her how she feels. I guarantee you, it will be within the context of, “how do you feel about Ditty’s new _____?” As if her feelings and opinions will still only matter in the context of his existence.
Or perhaps this future will not come to pass. Perhaps we CAN change the narrative. Rewording a headline may seem like petty semantics, however, as all psychologists & marketers know – word choice matters.
Highlight what reader’s value – how about we begin, highlighting values so that readers can begin to recognize what and whom, truly matter.
Cassie
Cassi
White Irises
Ogawa Kazumasa
Cherry Blossom
Ogawa Kazumasa
June 11,2024
So many competing concepts and seemingly contradictory tokens of wisdom are littered across the internet. “Dating gurus” and “life coaches” seem to be more common than the people seeking them out. How does one know where to start? Whom to trust? How to identify the “good advice” from the misinformation?
It’s true that “bad advice” ensures that professionals like me will forever be in business picking up the pieces of the damage caused, however, that is precisely what we are trying to prevent from happening in the first place!
The whole point of mental health care is to work oneself out of a job. The better a client is doing; the more successful treatment has been. That is assuming it is the treatment that has made the client’s prognostic outcome a positive one, and not some other variable.
Acknowledging the fact that most advice givers have the best of intentions, they can cause a massive amount of revictimization and trauma. When it is someone claiming to be an “expert” without the proper training, we can point to the individual for failing to be properly informed and thus, culpable for consequences. However, environments such as “Peer Support Groups” are culprits of this as well. Whom do we hold responsible for the consequences of misdirection here?
When I decided to begin my solo practice, I decided to join several “support groups” online to get a sense of what people were struggling with. What questions were they asking? Where were they turning to for help? And most importantly, what kind of “support” and “advice” was being offered. I wanted to know if there was anything I could do.
The result of this foray into the wilds of social media left me horrified and deeply concerned. No, not “faux outrage” concerned, but keep me up at night scrambling for a remedy level concern.
My concerns stemmed from multiple angles. First being, of course, the original poster, the “OP,” whose anguish is often visceral. Pleas for help as they wade through the trepidatious waters of abuse filled my screen. “Wow it really is this bad… STILL!” I thought. It appears no matter how many Tic Tock videos, Instagram clips or YouTube “How To’s,” exist, it does not appear as though they have made much of an impact.
#MeToo has already become a historical relic gathering dust with each passing day.
My second concern was the one that haunts me most – the comment section. Now, I AM aware of internet trolls. I anticipate being a woman with an opinion on anything will have its inevitable magnetic affect at some point. However, these forums, allegedly designed for members to provide meaningful support to one another, connecting over their common traumas brought the most HORRIFIC censure, gaslighting, bullying, and revictimization I have ever seen.
Perhaps it’s a result of projection. Perhaps there is a conspiracy of abusers that have banded together to join these groups and use them as hunting grounds to attack wounded prey. For my part, I believe all these dangerous responses are born from ignorance or misinterpretation.
Which brings me to my third concern: these groups are not run by professionals. They are not moderated much at all, and only some rules are enforced consistently. Thus, the comment sections have carte blanche to say what they will. In comes the victim blaming, the uninformed concept of consent, the ignorant assumptions of abuse and mental health and the list goes on.
My fourth concern – these groups are structured with rules and boundaries (if enforced) – rightfully so. The rules are in place for valid reasons. However, as with anything, there can be an unfortunate unforeseen consequence. What I have found is this: by prohibiting “solicitation” & “marketing” of any kind from professionals, it prevents the REAL, verifiable experts from chiming in to fumigate the poisonous toxin of misinformation from spreading.
Of course, ethically no mental health provider should use these groups as a means of soliciting referrals for clientele. The “No-Solicitation” rule effectively reinforces that this cannot happen. Agreed. However, it also prevents professionals from reaching out and making meaningful contact with people who desperately need and deserve ACCURATE & SAFE information and resources. The only way to distinguish our voices amidst the toxic fumes of abuse in these forums is to state loudly – I AM A PROFESSIONAL -I KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT!
And though the “No Solicitation / Marketing” rule allows us to state that much at least, we are unable to follow up with – go to THIS RESOURCE, read THIS BOOK, there’s THIS SUPPORT GROUP, (a real one), there’s THIS SPECIALIST, etc. without it being flagged as marketing or advertising.
We cannot offer to reach out directly to OP’s, to follow up with them, as some members are encouraged to do, without it looking as though we have a “hidden agenda” if we choose to not disclose we are a professional, and if we do disclose that we are, it presents the ethical issue, are we soliciting a group member for services – even if the conversation stays within a DM? Afterall, how much support should one offer before we are working for free?
The solution? I have tried several avenues. I have contacted group creators and asked for modified exceptions to group rules to allow for apropos resources to be permitted. I have contacted them and offered to provide brief educational “did you know…” style posts to help educate the group. Neither one of these strategies has resulted in so much as a reply.
So, I find myself replying to OP’s posts now and then. Especially when I see comments that are especially egregious, as my way of offering a small intervention to offset the poison. It is exhausting and I am aware that this method is a surefire way to burn myself out.
What is left?
Start my own group and run it, you say? Yes, that is what “Dangerous Dating” is for. At least, an attempt to try and be a voice in the void. I begin this group with the goal of creating a healthy & safe environment. One that is carefully structured to allow people to connect authentically, while being assured that the information they are receiving is accurate and their goals are being safeguarded. My hope is that members will create healthier connections, using a different forum, where people can interact in real time. At the end of the day, people seek out these groups to make connections with others who can understand them and their journeys. Human connection is healing. Especially when isolation is the number one weapon of our adversary. So, dear Reader, let’s connect and heal together!
June 12th, 2024
June 13th, 2024
June 14th, 2024
July 7th, 2024
July 15th, 2024
August 15th, 2024